ISEN-ASTC-L Archives

Informal Science Education Network

ISEN-ASTC-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Joanna Fisher <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informal Science Education Network <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:19:32 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (84 lines)
ISEN-ASTC-L is a service of the Association of Science-Technology Centers
Incorporated, a worldwide network of science museums and related institutions.
*****************************************************************************

I dream of helping children to have the 'aha' moment, to put them over
the top, as Jeff says.
If our mission is to stimulate inquiry, and our product is the process,
are we selling out if we focus on outcome measures? How do we continue
to focus on the higher learning processes (which lead to smarter kids in
the end) but still have the support of the schools and funders?

Joanna Fisher
The Children's Museum of Utah
801-456-5437 x104

-----Original Message-----
From: Informal Science Education Network
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of jeff courtman
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2004 7:50 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Science Centers & Testing

ISEN-ASTC-L is a service of the Association of Science-Technology
Centers
Incorporated, a worldwide network of science museums and related
institutions.
************************************************************************
*****

i tend to agree with bob, eric, and david - the notion of being able to
measure, through standardized testing, the impact of single, or even a
few,
visits to centers is setting up unrealisitc expectations, even thought
science centers are constantly connecting the dots.

connecting those dots is most often a rationalization used to attract
both
schools and funders.

the curious thing is you may have a child who is at the threshold of an
'aha' experience and who may experience something at a science center
that
puts them over the top, yet as david points out, how could you resonably
isolate it from other possible building blocks in this child's
construction
of their universe?

we all have our own personal takes - mine is this:  if a child has a
positive experience with science, in a center's informal setting, is it
wrong to consider this outcome the most important measure?  There are
lots
of things that fall out from such a view, such as empowerment, allowing
for
social learning, etc.  But by its nature, the experience is the
antithesis
to standardized testing.

having added my 2 cents, what about going back to the question of
rationalization?  do we as a group perpetuate  misperceptions because
such
rationalizing is vital to our survival?


Jeff Courtman
Mind-Works
4026 Richmond Ave
Shreveport, LA  71106
214.450.8872

***********************************************************************
More information about the Informal Science Education Network and the
Association of Science-Technology Centers may be found at
http://www.astc.org.
To remove your e-mail address from the ISEN-ASTC-L list, send the
message  SIGNOFF ISEN-ASTC-L in the BODY of a message to
[log in to unmask]

***********************************************************************
More information about the Informal Science Education Network and the
Association of Science-Technology Centers may be found at http://www.astc.org.
To remove your e-mail address from the ISEN-ASTC-L list, send the
message  SIGNOFF ISEN-ASTC-L in the BODY of a message to
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2