LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
gonneke van veldhuizen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 11 Nov 2007 02:25:36 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (56 lines)
I do not see this as Code breaking. This is not marketing bottles as lone items, they come with the pump and the text that goes with it says so clearly:
''Moedermelkflesjes

Ideaal om moedermelk in op te vangen, te bewaren en in te vriezen.

De melk kan direct uit de fles worden gebruikt na het ontdooien 
Kunnen worden gebruikt in combinatie met alle Medela kolven 
Gemaakt van polypropyleen, de veiligste kunststof om moedermelk in te bewaren''Mothermilk bottles
Ideal to catch, store and freeze mothermilk
Milk can be used from the bottle after thawing
bottles can be used with all Medela pumps
made of polypropylene, the safest artificial material for storing mothermilk.

The bottom message is not "Come and buy our bottles to feed your baby'', but ''Buy and use this bottle to feed your baby your own milk''. 
As I understand the parts of the Code that are about bottles and teats it is about the marketing of those items as lone products and as sole medium for infant feeding, thus replacing breastfeeding at all. Marketing includes pimping the article to sell and promising special, but unproven or unprovable benefits from it's use above other products. Marketing is not announcing that you have a product for sale and clarifying it's specifics (like material used). Selling is not a Code violation; marketing in certain ways is.

So perhaps it is more about interpretation. Perhaps language issues play a role as well. But in all honesty and with my own ethical conscience as guide, I do not see any Code violation in the way Medela sells it's bottles.

Warmly,

Gonneke, IBCLC, LLL in southern Netherlands.


----- Original Message ----
From: Karleen Gribble <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 10:59:52 AM
Subject: Re: [LACTNET] Medela Code compliant or not

Gonneke,
Currently Medela are breaching the Code in Australia via their
 Australian
website (according to ICDC). We shall see if that changes. It seems
 from
discussions that people like Jenni have had with them that it may.
I think that this advertisement breaches the Code. It appears in
 essence to
be the same as that Australian website.
http://www.medela.nl/BENELUX/nl/breastfeeding/products/bottles.php
It is my understanding that "Feeding bottles" with or without teats are
 a
breach of the Code.



             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2