LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Magda Sachs <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Jul 2007 09:39:44 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Nina, 

you asked:
I am wondering when the risks associated with
slow growth begin to outweigh the risks associated with supplementation.
Has anyone done or seen any research on this? 

During my Phd researches, begun in 1999, thought this was a really key 
question, and I searched.  I didn't find anything, which may not mean that 
there isn't anything, but no one has come up to me to tell me about it after 
my papers have been published, etc.  I think it is astonishing that we don't 
have investigation of this issue.  I think it really illuminates our culture 
and supervaluing of weight gain over other well-baby measures.  Of course, 
it is complex as to how our culure came to this and how we exported it.  
Obviously there is some physiological oxymoronic truth to the value for 
infant growth!!  But we have it all out of proportion, in a lot of 
interesting ways. 

Magda Sachs, PhD.
Breastfeeding Supporter, BfN, UK 

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
Mail all commands to [log in to unmask]
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or [log in to unmask])
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet or ([log in to unmask])
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2