LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Teresa Vinisky <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 24 Dec 2001 09:46:23 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
In a message dated 12/23/01 9:09:51 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<< There is some evidence that multiples not only grow more slowly but also
 develop more slowly in the last several weeks in utero. In other words,
 some studies show that multiples born at 35 - 36 weeks share some
 indicators of development with more premature singletons. It's mostly
 just my conclusion, but it is consistent with the fact that disparity in
 growth between multiples and singletons increases with gestation and
 also with increased incidence of symmetry disorders. It would be great
 if research were done on how all of this effects suck, but ever since I
 have started looking I have noticed how often twins and triplets have
 disorganized suck, facial palsy, tongue-tie or something that might
 possibly be related to this. (Not good research yet, I realize.) >>

This is a timely subject for me, as I just finished reading "Having Twins"
last night after finding out a week ago today that I'm having twins! (At a
mere 22 weeks into the pregnancy!) One of the chapters I read last night did
talk about this, so I'm a bit confused. It stated that where Singletons
usually don't start to slow down in growing until around 36 weeks? I think,
that multiples are there at about 30 weeks? and triplets around 26-28. Those
weeks might be a bit off, but it's basically along those lines, which made me
also wonder this exact thing. Everyone of course tells me not to expect to
carry these babies 39-40 weeks that twins just come earlier. Well, when ARE
twins considered full term? Are they considered full term earlier than a
singleton?  Are triplets considered full term earier than twins?  The book
never really answered this other than saying growing slowed.
I searched the archives this AM also, prior to reading this on twins. it was
helpful to see a few women here who did exclusively bf twins as even though I
know it can be done, I'm getting all of this "helpful" information daily
telling me that it's just too much and most don't do it for more than a few
weeks. I don't even consider just a few weeks an option though!
Teresa in PA-LLL Leader, SAHM to Brady (4), Abbey, (almost 3) and twins due
April 2002

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2