LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Judy K. Dunlap, RNC, IBCLC" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Sep 1995 19:47:13 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
I have often wished there were another "diagnosis" for the well-loved and
cared-for breastfed baby who isn't gaining weight.   "Failure to thrive" is
just the most incredibly negative term.  It has to be devastating to a new
mother to have her child labeled FTT--and herself labeled, by implication, as
incompetent, un-nurturing, ignorant, abusive, etc.  I  saw a mom this summer
whose baby was an ounce or two below birth weight at his two weeks peds
exam---and the pediatrician marked FTT as the diagnosis for billing
purposes--at two weeks!!!  Good grief!!!    I saw them at three weeks, by
which time the baby had more than made up for his slow start, and was
obviously thriving..  The mom was more than a little distressed, but she was
an intelligent, mature woman who knew the term had been misapplied in her
case, so she didn't panic and run for the formula, which I figure is the more
common reaction. (She also didn't confront the pediatrician or ask him to
explain, I think because she was so overwhelmed at the time.)  It seems to me
to be an act of cruelty to use such a pejorative term casually.

Judy D in WV

ATOM RSS1 RSS2