LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Nancy Williams, MA, MFCC, CCE, IBCLC" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 Sep 1996 19:18:15 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Hi all:

I recently went to a seminar on feeding the high risk infant.  Although there
was an excellent presentation by an LC, some of the rest of the info was
disappointing to me.
At one point a statement was made that I'd like your thoughts on.  The
presenters stated that for babies who were cocaine-exposed in utero, it was
important to feed water or other "neutral" hydrolizers, but not to give milk
feeds because there may be some necrotic tissues which the *fermenting* milk
would compromise, allowing NEC to set in.  I raised my hand and made the
point that that while that may certainly be true with ABM, I didn't see how
breastmilk, a physiologic and living tissue would ferment, besides the fact
that it has NEC preventative and healing properties.
She assured me that I am wrong.  I forgot to leave my card for her to send
documentation.
Any of you know which one of us is correct?
Nancy

ATOM RSS1 RSS2