LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Patricia Ellis <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 Feb 2001 22:16:42 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (66 lines)
Please send me a copy of your fee study results.  TIA, Patricia Ellis,
RN,MA,IBCLC
[log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Hafner-Eaton" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 11:31 AM
Subject: fee study results


> I'm posting this again for those who might have been nomail or missed it
the
> first time.  If you emailed me your email address and have NOT received
the
> results (the last group went out via emali today), then email me again
> because it means I never received your request.  Please put your email
> address in the body of your email  too.
>
> For those who are perplexed as to what I'm talking about...
> About a year ago I posted a survey asking about practice patterns and LC
> fees/charges.  If you were one of the hundreds of respondents (thank you
> again) who wanted a copy of the results, now is your chance.  I brought
many
> copies to ILCA, but they ran out in only 10 minutes.  Upon returning from
> ILCA, I discovered that my hard drive had been infected and virtually
> everything was scrambled.  Fortunately, I keep backups on disk; however,
the
> disk version was a subsetted version without the "unique identifiers"
(your
> names and email addresses).  So, here I am grovelling...if you want
results,
> please privately email me.  No, I cannot post the results.  Someone
objected
> to this last year and I agreed to comply.
>
> Please take note of the full discussion section.  If one only reads the
> gross per hour  calculation, the findings are misleading.  In the
discussion
> section, I've added a table that takes the average minimum amount of
> nonbillable hours plus the one billable hour and divides that (5) into the
> charges for the hour (either straight charges or derived for the
> fee-for-service group).  There are more analyses forthcoming and I must
say
> that the information shared was invaluable.  I hope to put it in a format
> that all LCs will find useful.  For now, my faithful participants deserve
at
> least this much.
>
> Thanks again.
> --
> --Chris Hafner-Eaton, PhD, MPH, CHES, IBCLC    [log in to unmask]
> INFANT CUISINE AND MOTHER CARE: Lactation Consulting, Perinatal Health
> Education and Attachment Parenting Classes for parents and practitioners
>
>              ***********************************************
> The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
> LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
> mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
> http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2