LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sarah Barnett <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 11 Feb 1996 07:18:24 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
I am re-posting this because nobody answered my question :(

Sarah Friend Barnett, LLLL, IBCLC
Bronx (New York City), New York
[log in to unmask]


Hi
I have a question about this that has been kicking around in my brain for
a while.  I understand the problems with reading a mammogram on a
milk-filled breast.  My questions are:  when weaning is recommended it is
usually done fairly quickly (a week or two) and then the mammogram is
performed.  Is the breast really a non-lactating one at this stage?
Doesn't it take longer for the tissue to be in a state where it is not so
dense?  How long would it likely to be necessary to wait in order to get
definitive results?  Aren't we then really messing with the risk benefit
ration if a woman is waiting almost a month before any mammogram.?  etc.
I really am confused and would appreciate some info from those in the know.
TIA

Sarah Friend Barnett, LLLL, IBCLC
Bronx (New York City), New York
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2