LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 15 Dec 2006 20:00:41 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (195 lines)
Hi everyone,
I've found the discussion on the energy 'toll' of breastfeeding fascinating, but as to the original question of how to counter the doctor who ordered formula.  How about addressing the other issue--that giving any newborn with kidney problems formula is going to stress the kidneys even more?  I know I've seen info about the stress on kidneys in dealing with formula vs. breast milk.  Anyone know more?
Marcia McCoy, who likes to check for back doors and side windows when the front door seems to be locked

-- LACTNET automatic digest system <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
There are 2 messages totalling 142 lines in this issue.

Topics of the day:

  1. The work of breastfeeding
  2. Calories a baby uses to breastfeed

Lactnet Archives are at:
LACTNET Archives http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/lactnet.html
To Manage your Subscription, ie go nomail, index, etc, go to:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/lactnet.html

Thanks- Kathleen Bruce, Kathy Koch, Rachel Myr,
Melissa Vickers, Karen Zeretzke, Karleen Gribble, LACTNET Facilitators

Questions to [log in to unmask]

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET email list is powered by LISTSERV (R).
There is only one LISTSERV. To learn more, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:    Thu, 14 Dec 2006 22:27:45 -0500
From:    Karen Gromada <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: The work of breastfeeding

> Any good NICU nurse can bottle-feed a ROCK - the baby only has to swallow 
> (and breathe occasionally).  Breastfeeding requires an active infant effort, even 
> with a good maternal milk supply.
> The point is - we shouldn't be force-feeding any infant, but we do - to get 
> them home faster and save money (in the short term).
> 

In the short term is right! (And thanks for pointing this out!) With the lit review my colleague and I are doing in writing up our teat flow trial, we've learned that what isn't known and how health professionals aren't taught re: the bottle-feeding process via-a-vis infant oral/airway safety becomes recognized as a huge and interesting void. (My personal favorite info describes what the author calls "adaptive" sucking behavior that actually points out the maladaptiveness of the behavior.)  The long-term potential effects re: oral aversion, eating "disorder" and GI disturbance seems to be missed completely -- or almost so. 

To "feed a rock" that actually is a human being with personality and feelings = risk oral/airway physical and emotional distress and sucking "adaptation" that is species maladaptive. How proud all those staff members should be about their concern with their little patients' well-being.

Personally, I find the lack of evidence-based info and skill provision re: safe bottle-feeding to be appalling, especially because it appears to reflect an acceptance of status quo ignorance. 

Karen

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET email list is powered by LISTSERV (R).
There is only one LISTSERV. To learn more, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

------------------------------

Date:    Thu, 14 Dec 2006 23:49:54 -0500
From:    Kermaline Cotterman <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Calories a baby uses to breastfeed

No offense intended to any previous posters, and perhaps I am being really
naive here, but "proof" and "data" and "evidence" seem like such laughable
concepts for anyone to try to generalize so as to automatically apply
routinely to the manner of feeding of a premature, or a normal newborn for
that matter.


It depends!!!!


It depends on the individual situation. It depends on the person who is
feeding the baby, as well as the individual baby. Specifically, it depends
on the balance between the ease of milk transfer and the individual baby's
ability to coordinate suck/swallow/breathing, regardless of whether the baby
is being breastfed or bottle fed.


The following are typically big "ifs" for a sleep-deprived, hormonally and
perhaps "anesthetically" and surgically recuperating mother, but I will
hypothesize anyway.


If we can assist the mother in
1) as natural an onset of Lactogenesis II as possible, plus
2) help her notice feeding cues and stress cues, and
3) explain to her how to use her breast as a feeding tool,
4) teaching her how important the pliability of the areola is in milk
transfer, and
5) how to achieve that pliability, and
6) help her appreciate the miracle of the milk ejection reflex and
7) how to trigger it in advance of feeding, and
8) how to use alternate massage appropriately,


it seems to me that feedings need not necessarily be prolonged, and the
breast need not necessarily always be thought of as a source of "work" for
even a tiny baby to transfer milk.  OTOH, if breast swelling, either edema,
normal engorgement or edema superimposed on normal engorgement is
interfering with easy access to subareolar ducts and the stimulation of the
MER, even the most robust baby is going to have to expend "work" to
transfer even a little milk at a feeding, in the meantime endangering the
integrity of the nipple.


"Work", or energy of a different kind is expended if the adult feeding the
baby a bottle is unaware of the importance of pacing and allows the baby to
continue to suck and swallow rapidly (sometimes desperately to keep from
choking). There is very good evidence that in prematures at least, this can
cause episodes of bradycardia. How many calories does it take the poor baby
to recuperate from any such cardiorespiratory distress?? To say nothing of
the stressful body memories and psychological associations it attaches to
the process of eating! Not to mention the complications associated with
overfeeding. GERD, the diagnosis de jour, to hazard a guess about one!


I certainly hope this rapid feeding is no longer going on in hospital
nurseries as it did back in the decades when I worked in them, but I know
for a fact that many young parents, and for that matter, many grandmothers
and aunts are still totally unaware of this issue, because so many are still
interpreting the speed at which their baby may drink as proof that the baby
was "really hungry, because he took 2-3 ounces down, just like that!!!" I
have seen no evidence as yet that young parents in our town are routinely
being taught about pacing the flow rate of bottles. When a mother has opted
to use a bottle, such as in supplementing, or even when she may have decided
to "give up" on breastfeeding, I try to explain "pacing" to her in such a
way that she can interpret the baby's stress cues and identify with the
baby's feelings, and help her realize how pacing may be very important in
preserving the baby's willingness to breastfeed.


Thus, she has some chance of explaining it in such a way as to persuade her
boyfriend, or her mother, or her daycare provider to pace the flow. It's
hard enough to be a new mother without having to try to teach your own
mother, or an experienced day care provider a new way to bottle feed a
baby!


Being an advocate for the new mother and baby will continue to be one of our
most important roles.
Even with their physicians at times.


Jean
***************
K. Jean Cotterman RNC, IBCLC
Dayton, OH USA

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET email list is powered by LISTSERV (R).
There is only one LISTSERV. To learn more, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

------------------------------

End of LACTNET Digest - 14 Dec 2006 (#2006-1441)
************************************************




________________________________________________________________________
Try Juno Platinum for Free! Then, only $9.95/month!
Unlimited Internet Access with 1GB of Email Storage.
Visit http://www.juno.com/value to sign up today!

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET email list is powered by LISTSERV (R).
There is only one LISTSERV. To learn more, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2