LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kathleen Bruce by way of Kathleen Bruce <[log in to unmask]>" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 19 Mar 1996 23:55:59 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Date:    Fri, 1 Dec 1995 12:59:07 -0600
From:    "Dr. Tom Hale" <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Fluconazole vs Nizoral

RE:  Fluconazole

I would like to add support to Dr. Eglash's comments on using
Fluconazole(Diflucan).   I fully concur  with her comments.  We have a long
history using fluconazole in a pediatric population.  The FDA has even
designated the product as safe down to 1 day of age.   I agree that it is
horribly expensive(perhaps I should say Outrageously expensive),  but its
safety profile in pediatric patients is exemplary.

        I do not think that nizoral is a suitable alternative.  Nizoral
requires an acid stomach to be absorbed.  With the constant presence of
milk,  an acid environment suitable for absorption of nizoral is unlikely,
and could conceivably markedly reduce the absorption of nizoral in an
infant(we don't know for sure) .   If offers no real advantages over
fluconazole.

Tom Hale

ATOM RSS1 RSS2