LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Feb 1998 19:50:54 +0000
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From:
Comments:
cc: "Lisa A. Enger" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
So typical of course.  There are case reports in the literature of 
babies getting meningitis and septicemia from contaminated formula.  
Contaminated at the manufacturer's incidentally.  Not in a third world 
country, but in Holland, for example.  

Does this push these neonatologists to randomly sample the formula?  I 
thought so.

Mytjens HL, Roelofs-Willemse H, Jaspar GHJ. Quality of powdered 
substitutes for breastmilk with regard to members of the family 
Enterobacteriaceæ. J Clin Microbiol 1988;26:743-6

Biering G, Karlsson S, Clark NC, Jonsdottir KE, Ludvigsson P, 
Steingrimsson O. Three cases of neonatal meningitis caused by 
Enterobacter sakazakii in powdered milk. J Clin Microbiol 1989;27:2054-6

Jack Newman, MD, FRCPC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2