LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 24 Nov 1996 10:05:11 -0500
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: EBM different than direct-from-breast for jaundice??
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From:
"Linda J. Smith" <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
To: Beth Hilleke <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (6 lines) 
Beth asked of a doc's information: <<EBM was different than directly-nursed milk, and that it was more effective in treatment of jaundice.>>

The milk's not different. How could it be? What might be different is the volume obtained, since many young babies have slightly impaired suck from birth insults. So pumping in addition to breastfeeding might be an excellent suggestion for this mom. Good strategy, slightly off-the-mark rationale IMHO. Sounds like someone who needs a LITTLE more information and lots of support for being mostly correct.

Linda Smith, Dayton OH

ATOM RSS1 RSS2