LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Barbara Wilson-Clay,BSE,IBCLC" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Aug 1996 20:49:15 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
D. Hudspeth asked about research on the composition of breastmilk in induced
lactation.   The Nutritional Value of Breast Milk From Non-Pregnant Mothers.
Nutr Reviews, 1981; 39(8):308-9.

I have a hard copy of the article, which, interestingly lists no author, but
does list 9 footnoted references, including citations of work by M. Newton,
D.B. and E.F.P. Jelliffe, and others.

The gist of this article is review of work by  R. Kleinman, Protein Values
of Milk Samples from Mothers without Biological Pregnancies, J Pediatr,
1980; 97:612-615.
This work (which I have not read firsthand) compared the protein
characteristics of milk from non-biological mothers with that from
postpartum women.  The sample size is small --  5 women with lactations
induced to nurse adopted babies. Their milk appeared to skip the colostral
phase.  It bore more resemblance to transitional and mature milk in terms of
total protein concentration and SIgA.  The review made the comment that
Kleinmans work was but a tantalizing glimpse into this issue -- that it only
studied a few of the chem. componants.  How sad that in so many years no one
else has looked at this issue.  Or have I missed it?
Barbara

Barbara Wilson-Clay, BS, IBCLC
Private Practice, Austin, Texas
Owner, Lactnews On-Line Conference Page
http://moontower.com/bwc/lactnews.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2