Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 20 Nov 2006 14:29:23 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
The explanation for this second credential from IBLCE seems to me to be very
vague. Who identified a need and what exactly is the need for IBLCE to
create a second exam? This is not a second credential, it is about the 5th or 6th
that would be floating around the lactation community. All of these
"credentials" have created a situation and mess similar to what the nursing profession
has gotten itself into - multiple credentials, confusion as to what type of
care is delivered, and splintering the profession. All of these credentials
have made it very difficult to write language for licensing the IBCLC. When we
started to write that language in Massachusetts it became very burdensome to
sort through what these credentials actually meant. Hospitals and consumers
are already confused enough as it is. The medical profession is working hard
to limit what advanced practice nurses can do, they created the physician
assistant credential to limit nursing autonomy. Do we want this to happen to us
because we cannot figure out what to do with ourselves?
We still haven't gotten the IBCLC credential into the mainstream of health
care, let alone adding yet another credential. I do not think it is up to
IBLCE to define and steer the lactation profession into troubled waters. We need
the IBCLC credential marketed better and strengthened with a defined college
level education as an entry requirement, reimbursement codes for lactation
services, and autonomy in the profession (not a watered down hand maiden
mentality).
I remain very concerned over a lack of transparency within IBLCE and am
uneasy over our future.
Marsha Walker, RN, IBCLC
Weston, MA
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET email list is powered by LISTSERV (R).
There is only one LISTSERV. To learn more, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|