Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 11 Sep 2001 03:29:05 EDT |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In einer eMail vom 11-9-01 1:10:15 West-Europa (zomertijd) schreibt
[log in to unmask]:
> . It is
> tempting to consider the manufacturers of supplementing devices as
> potential donors. I assume, however, I would lose the credibility I would
> need to conduct studies comparing various devices and their success rates
> if I had previously received money from one particular manufacturer.
Would the results of such a study be compromised if you were supported (in
money and/or supplies, ie having the devices for free) by *all* of the
manufaturers of devices you test? If they all pay an equal part , no one is
or can feel more entitled to become the ''winner''. Or would this be
unethical as well?
Just wondering.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gonneke van Veldhuizen, IBCLC
MOM, LLLL, primary schoolteacher
Hiilensberg, Germany
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|